Court Fee Act 1870

Section 17 : Multifarious suits   2015  PLD  356   KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH MUHAMMAD HANIF VS HASHMAT BANO 4—Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Sched. II, Art.17—Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, Rr.10 & 11—Suit for partition—Court fee, affixation of—Scope—Plaint, rejection of—Defendants filed application for return of plaint to the plaintiff for presentation in the court having […]

Section 13 : Refund of fee paid on memorandum of appeal   2012  CLC  1878   KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Syed IMDAD HUSSAIN SHAH NAQVI VS REHMAT KHAN VARDAG 13—Application for return of court-fee—Compromise between the parties after about two months of filing the suit—Contention of the plaintiff was that since the matter had been compromised between the parties

Section 12 : Decision of question as to valuation   2018  CLC  805   PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Mir JAWAZ KHAN VS GUL BATH KHAN 149 & O.VII, R.11—Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Ss.12 & 28—Suits Valuation Act (VII of 1887), S.11—Rejection of plaint—Non-deposit of requisite court-fee—Scope—Suit was filed against petitioners who sought rejection of plaint on grounds

Section 11 : Procedure in suits for mesne profits or account when amount decreed exceeds amount claimed   2016  PLD  602   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Mst. RASHIDAN BIBI VS AMAN ULLAH KHAN BANGSH 33 & O.XX. R.6—Partition Act (IV of 1893), S.4—Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), S.11—Suit for partition—Non-preparation of decree due to non-submission of stamp papers—Effect—Decree

Section 10 : Procedure where net profits or market-value wrongly estimated 2018  MLD  2054   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE NAZIR AHMAD BHATTI VS M. YOUNAS Ss. 10, 6 & 28—Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R. 11—Court-fee, determination of—Rejection of plaint on ground of insufficient court-fee—Scope—Plaint or memo. of appeal could not be rejected or dismissed on

Section 9 : Power to ascertain net profits or market value 1991  CLC  1375   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE ABDUL GHANI VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 115 & O.XLI, R. 23 — Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), S.9 — Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199–Trial Court’s order not conforming to, but offending against order of remand — Effect —

Section 8 : Fee on  memorandum of appeal against order relating to compensation   2020  CLC  442   PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT PROJECT DIRECTOR NHA VS NAYYAR ZAMAN 8— Court fee, computation of— Memorandum of appeal— Procedure— Provisions of section 8 of Court Fees Act, 1870 by itself are not a charging section and it only provides mode and

Section 7 : Computation of fees payable in certain suits   2002  PLD  1   HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR MUHAMMAD LATIF VS AMIR-UD-DIN —-S. 14—Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), S.7 (v)(b)—Suits Valuation Act (VII of 1887), S. 3—Pre-emption suit—Jurisdictional value–Determination—Land was assessed to land revenue, but for some reason, the same was not recovered for being exempted 2001 

Section 6 : Fees on documents filed, etc., in mufassal Courts or in public offices   2018  MLD  2070   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Malik ALLAH YAR VS Mst. NAZRAN KHATOON Ss. 6 & 28—Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII R. 11—Court fee, determination of—Deficiency in court-fee—Rejection of plaint on ground of deficiency in court-fee—Scope—Plaint or any

Section 5 : Procedure in case of difference as to necessity or amount of fee   2020  PLD  736   SUPREME-COURT ASAD ALI VS The BANK OF PUNJAB Ss.3 & 5—Court-fees Act (VII of 1870), Chap. II (Ss.3 to 5)—High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol. 5, Chap. I, Judicial Business, Pt. A (a), Rr. 1(a)(iii)