RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule . /index.php [L] RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule . /index.php [L] Section 41A Banking Companies Ordinance 1962 - LawSite.today

Section 41A Banking Companies Ordinance 1962

Section 41A : Power of the State Bank to remove directors or other managerial persons from office

 

2004  CLD  1680   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE VS DIRECTOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE

—Ss.33, 33-A [as added by Banking Companies (Amendment) Act (XIV of 1997)], 41(1) & 41-A—State Bank of Pakistan Circular No.22, dated 30-6-2003–State Bank of Pakistan Act (XXXII of 1956), S.3—Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.4, 9; 14, 25 & 199

2004  CLD  1407   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

ASLAM HASSAN QURESHI VS GOVERNOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and 4 others

—S.41-A—Removal of directors or other managerial persons—Powers of State Bank—Object—Provision of S-41-A of Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962, was introduced in order to maintain purity of Banking Institutions.

2003  CLD  1094   KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

SALEEM SHEIKH VS STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

—-Ss.41-A & 41-C—Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199—Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court —Scope–­Existence of alternate remedy—Requirements—Removal of Directors or other managerial persons of a Banking Company by the State Bank o

2002  CLD  1794   SUPREME-COURT

RAUF B. KADRI VS STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

Banking Companies Ordinance 1962 —-Ss.41-A & 41-B—Scope and appreciation of Ss.41-A & 41-B, Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962.

2002  PLD  1111   SUPREME-COURT

RAUF B. KADRI VS STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

—-S. 306—Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962), Ss. 41-A & 41-B—Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, R.10—Petition for winding-up proceedings of a Financial Institution—Inability of the institution to pay its debts—State Bank of Pakist

1986  CLC  2197   LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

HAIDERJ INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LTD. VS STATE BANK

Banking Companies Ordinance 1962 —S. 41-A–Prohibition of double jeopardy, principle of–Plea of such principle, held, would be misconceived because of criminal case having been registered against directors of Company whereas notices were issued for taking action against company, which is a separate legal entity as distinct from its directors.

Shopping Cart
× How can I help you?