Section 6 : Revocation how made
1997 PLD 59 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. VS AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAH
Contract Act 1872 S. 6(2)—Forest Leases, Regulation of Procedure for, Regln. 38—Sale of Forest Ranges—Proposal—Acceptance—Reasonable time—Acceptance of proposal after prescribed time of acceptance—Effect—Acceptance of proposal after lapse of more than three months was not within reasonable time—Proposal made by buyer, therefore, would be deemed to have been revoked–Acceptance of proposal must have come within 15 or at the most 20 days in terms of Regln. 38 of Forest Leases Regulations—Proposal in question, having been accepted after prescribed time would be deemed as revoked by conduct of petitioner.
1994 SCMR 1758 SUPREME-COURT
CALICON (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Contract Act 1872 —-S. 6(3)—Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)—Successful bidder for acquisition of specified shares was required to deposit proportional share of the value of bid through bank draft within thirty days, failure of which would culminate in rejection of bid and forfeiture of earnest money—Petitioner as successful bidder instead of complying with the terms of acceptance of offer started raising all sorts of questions with respect to the terms of agreement which had not even been signed—Authority was correct in rejecting petitioner’s offer and starting negotiations with the second highest tenderer–Such course was strictly in accordance with the commercial practice and the approved procedure—Petitioner, thus, had no right which could be enforced through constitutional jurisdiction—Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.
1983 CLC 1762 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
NATIONAL DISINFECTANT COMPANY VS NATIONAL DETERGENTS LTD
XXXIX, r. 4 read with Contract Act (IX of 1872), Ss. 5 3t 6 and Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 115-Stay of pending suit-Direction to file monthly statements of account during such stay Order of stay of pending suit for infringement of trade mark not incorporating applicants’ offer to file monthly statements of account in Court-Respondents praying inter alia for issuance of direction to applicants to file monthly statements of income-Held, such direction could be given while ordering stay of pending suit for infringement of trade mark-field further, applicants trying to take advantage of omission to incorporate such direction in stay order and they cannot be permitted to resile from their own offer.